| |
The
curtain fell in June 1998 on one of the oldest British
styled institutions, set up for the merchandising of
a divergent product such as tea. The sound of the “Gavel,"
the emblem of authority through the centuries that had
remained as the Harold’s wand for transferring
the ownership of the many millions of tea sold at the
auctions, will be heard no more. It is no doubt a sad
idea, but in today’s world of commerce, the London
auction has failed to move on with the developments
that have taken place in other fields.
Through their direct
involvement on the production side, commencing with
plantations in British India, followed up in Sri Lanka,
and later shifting their bases to East Africa, London
became truly an international centre for the marketing
of tea. London is the only Auction Centre in the world
that is not a producing country, but has been marketing
teas from numerous producer countries.
London attracted
widespread buying interest, where teas from a great
variety of producing countries were regularly offered
in competition with each other. London, because of its
strategic location, provided a centre for the re-export
of tea to over fifty destinations.
The auction system
was acclaimed as the universal remedy for the marketing
of tea. The inauguration of this system in London helped
to establish a global system of tea auctions in most
producer countries, thereby creating a world market
for tea. This arrangement worked perfectly as long as
the world’s tea production was under British control.
As the industry in the producer countries developed,
and became more matured, they were looking for defects
in the system.
Prior to world
war two, more than sixty percent of teas produced by
British interests the world over, was marketed in London.
After the cessation of hostilities, London auctions
did not reopen until 1951, whereas sales were resumed
in Calcutta in 1946, and in Colombo in 1947. Due to
the problem of disposal, new auction centres were started
in other producer countries.
The Chittagong
auction commenced operating from 16th July 1949. East
African auction centres began channelling their own
teas through Nairobi in 1956, Mombasa in 1969, and Limbe
in 1970. India opened up auction centres in Cochin in
1947, Coonoor in 1963, Amritsai in 1964, Gauhati in
1970, Silguri in 1976, and Coimbatore in 1981.
Most producer countries
after having taken the clue from Britain, were fast
to develop their own methods of marketing tea. This
was all done at the expense of London. The post war
period witnessed a sharp drop in the quantities consigned
for London auctions. In contrast, quantities sold at
the auction centres in producer countries have increased,
and for 1996, Sri Lanka had consigned over 95% of its
production through the Colombo auctions.
Marketing of tea
in the countries of origin has a direct attraction to
the producers, as it converts their produce into cash
within a short period of time. Further, the change of
ownership of plantations has also altered the balance
in favour of domestic auctions. London does not receive
the support of most of our regular buyers, who between
them keep the Colombo market active. The Middle East
sector, and the CIS along with the Russian federation
did not operate in London, with the result producers
were forced to brace Colombo, to obtain the maximum
support for their teas.
London failed to
keep abreast of local prices. The pattern of tea exports
to the UK itself has changed, and the later trends indicated
that the London auction was fast losing its importance
as a source of supply to the British consumer. They
started to operate more forcefully in the countries
of origin, to secure their requirements. It was estimated
that only about 15% of the tea consumed in the UK appear
to have been purchased in London.
In addition, a
number of indirect advantages were identified, that
benefited the country in the long run if all Sri Lanka
teas are sold locally. If all activities associated
with the export of teas were conducted in the country,
the earning power of both the broker and the shipper
would improve. Employment opportunities in the country
were bound to look up, and additional avenues for all
those associated with the industry to enhance their
earning power surfaced. A new perspective dawned to
local exporters. With the tea industry now looking up,
there will be greater opportunities for value addition,
and with it the net foreign exchange earnings were bound
to increase.
The London auctions
no doubt served a very useful purpose during the pioneering
days of tea marketing, but today, it has outlived its
usefulness. The decision to dispense with the London
auctions would have been taken after a great deal of
deliberations amongst the members of the British tea
trade. This forma is a very close fraternity of tea
persons, and it would have been a very difficult task
for the few people in authority to pass the ultimate
resolution to wind up operations. This would have been
one of the most intricate issues that surfaced during
this century, for the British tea trade.
The expected shadow
did fall on the most celebrated locations such as Mincing
Lane, The Plantation House, Sir John Lyon House, and
the London Chamber of Commerce Building, that acquired
fame and esteem, due to its involvement with tea. Tea
will not be traded in these locations any more. and
the London tea trade will have to reset their sights,
if they are to continue in tea business. This, no doubt
is going to be a trying time for those Britishers involved
in tea, but with the experience gained through centuries
in tea marketing, they will evolve a method to remain
in business.
This news no doubt
came as a surprise even to those outside Britain, as
the auction system originated in that country in the
17th century, for the sale of ancient books and artefacts,
where its proper assessment of its true value was found
difficult to determine. The first sale of this nature
of which there is any record in England, was tried out
in 1676 by a booker seller called Cooper. He prefixed
his catalogue of rare books with “readers, it
had not been unusual here in England, to make sale of
books, by the way of auction, but having being practised
in other countries to the great advantage of both buyer
and seller, it was therefore conceived, for the encouragement
of learning, to publish the sale of these books in this
manner of way."
The tea auction
was an institution initially set up for transferring
extensive quantities of tea from China, where it was
grown, to the Western world, where it was so eagerly
consumed. Monopoly had been the name of the game, and
this had left a permanent mark on the reputation of
the British trade, and the marketing of tea was no exception.
The public outcry was against the British East India
Company, who held the monopoly for the conveyance of
China tea to Europe.
It was only in
1836, that serious notice was given to this shortcoming
in monopolistic form of trading, and for the first time,
it was decreed that every chest must be auctioned at
East India House. This in a way was a break away from
the normal machinery of commerce.
The East India
Company, being a quasi-government body, was able to
enforce the law. In the midst of such accusations, the
authorities felt that it was more prudent to dispose
of the cargoes by public ‘outcry’ at the
auction rooms rather than by private deals, where there
was rich scope for corruption.
It is estimated
that in the free world about 75% of the tea produced
is sold through the auction system, and it had been
so for the about 158 years. Marketing of tea through
the auction system is the most popular method of disposal
of tea It is the very nature of tea as product of infinite
varieties that has made it to retain this system for
such a long time. It is said that the quality of tea
depends as much on nature as on man. The jat of the
tea bush, soil, altitude, climatic changes, wind velocity,
and seasons, all play their part in infusing the varying
degrees of quality into tea. It is very sensitive to
atmospheric changes, that day to day weather changes
leaves their impression on the quality of the tea. Unlike
most other commodities, tea cannot be designed to be
brought and sold on predetermined specifications. Tea
is an infinitely varied product, which needed to be
sampled, and catalogued, almost accurately chest by
chest.
The obvious way
of establishing a value for a product of this nature,
was at the auction room, where all buyers were given
an equal opportunity to purchase their requirements.
By 1750, the British East India Company auction system
had developed. On arrival of the precious cargo, the
tea chests were transferred to the company’s warehouses,
and samples drawn from each chest. They were then presented
to the their panel of tea “tasters” for
grading and valuing. All their findings were entered
into huge fat catalogues. The entire tea trade, comprising
of brokers, their clients, and the London tea merchants
would turn up at the East India house for the auction.
Bidding for these countless lots would continue for
four gruelling days. This modified strategy for the
marketing of tea however, did not in any way cover up
the monopolistic slant prevalent in the system. It was
no other person than Mr Twining, a household word today,
who missed no opportunity, to call to account the shortcomings
in the system.
Some of the original
customs that existed when auctions were held under candlelight,
are followed even to date. A successful bidder, is given
the opportunity to take up subsequent lots of equal
quality, and did not have to wait until the candle had
burnt down to the required extent.
The monopoly held
by the British East India Company, could not be held
forever. The reaction of the Americans, to the disposal
of excess leaf, the imposition of tea taxes, the loss
of the Chinese tea market with opium being the major
cause, all surfaced at a time when the Company’s
finances were sinking.
The tea monopoly
held by the company came under close scrutiny, when
the Company’s Charter came up for renewal. The
strong urge of the London tea merchants to dispense
with this monopoly was carried through in this instance.
A bill calling for the invalidation of the monopoly
held by the British East India Company was presented
in Parliament and received the Royal Assent on 28th
August 1833.
This great monopoly
came to an end, and the immediate response was to bring
the tea trade under the tea trader’s own management,
and to change the location of the tea auction to Mincing
Lane.
Many changes have
taken place subsequently, in the location of the auction
rooms. Mincing lane and in particular, Plantation House
at once stage, was world’s recognised centre of
the Tea Trade. Then the trade interests were relocated
at Lyon House, where the auction rooms had the best
panoramic view overlooking the river Thames. In 1990
the auction centre was once again moved to the Chamber
of Commerce Building, and held in the elegant Council
Chamber, considered a dignified setting for a grand
event. It was from this location that the candle that
was lit originally in 1750, started to dim from early
last year, and was finally extinguished in June 1998. |
| |
London
tea auction remains the oldest marketing centre in the
world, after having commenced operations on 10th January
1837. The sad news of its ending ceremony in June this
year will take many by surprise. The sales that were
conducted on a weekly basis will now be held on a fortnightly
basis before it is finally abandoned at the end of June
1998. It will no doubt be a sad moment for all those
associated with the London tea trade to witness the
last lot being knocked down at the final sale in June.
The gavel that had been the emblem of authority through
the centuries, and which has remained as the Harold’s
wand for the transfer of ownership, will be heard no
more.
Sale of tea by public auction had been
the principle channel of marketing since the early eighteen
centuries in England. Foremost vendor during the early
stages was the East India Company. On the purchasing
side too, all activities were again confined to a small
group of tea merchants, who enjoyed an exclusive right
to operate at the auctions.
Monopoly was the name of the game.
While the East India Company enjoyed the exclusive rights
of the Eastern Trade, which lasted for almost two and
a half century, this monopolistic form of trading where
there was a high concentration of buying and selling
activities in the hands of a few were not viewed favourably
by the business community. The public cry was against
the East India Company who held the monopoly for the
conveyance of Chinese tea to Europe. This Institution,
being a quasi-government body, was able to hold its
own up to a point, but were compelled to change their
attitude when the general public became hostile.
The short comings and the monopolistic
slant prevalent in the system was make public by no
other person other than Mr Twining himself. The various
brands he established, are house hold words today. He
advocated that it was more prudent to dispose of the
cargo by “public outcry” at the auction
rooms rather than by private deals, where there was
rich scope for corruption.
As a result of public agitation, the
entire modus operandi relating to the sale of tea by
the East India Company was coming to an end. A partial
victory was won in 1813 when the Indian trade was thrown
open. A further ten years passed before they cleared
the next hurdle. They were then permitted to indulge
in private trade in British ships within the limits
of the company’s charter. The monopoly of the
Chinese trade however was maintained by them. The main
motive for the final termination of the exclusive rights
of the East India Company enjoyed with the Chinese could
be summed up in one word-“opium." Though
this ill-famed drug was officially banned, it was universally
consumed in China.
Trading in contraband in Britain was
not in any way keeping with the theory of enfranchised
trade based on laisser-faire. Powers of the East India
Company had to be subdued, and the bill annulled. The
Royal Assent was obtained on 28th August 1933, and enforced
from 22nd April 1834.
The immediate reaction was to shift
the auctions from the East India house to another location,
after having liquidated their stocks at the last sale
held in July 1835. Large quantities of free trade teas
from India began to arrive from about the latter part
of 1834, and a new centre had to be found soon. The
congregation of brokers, merchants and dealers for the
first free trade was so large that the auction had to
be conducted in a commodious room in “Change Alley,"
used for an academy of dancing.
The tea trade in general has always
been regarded as a compromising lot, but at the first
auction, there had been exchange of acrimonious words,
between the selling broker and the buyers, on the subject
of quality. Loud shouts of “unfit for sale except
as poisons—withdraw –withdraw," were
heard. Suspected lots were withdrawn for the benefit
of all concerned, and the sale continued. The reaction
of buyers for any kind of unorthodox dealings was well
demonstrated from the very inception. The dispositions
governing future sales were thus established, and any
acts that would damage the smooth working of the tea
trade were censored. All misdeeds were frowned upon
and forbidden The London Auction has always been conducted
in an atmosphere of mutual understanding and goodwill.
With the end of the East India Company’s
monopoly, all eyes of tea men turned towards the Commercial
Sale Rooms in Mincing Lane. With it, the undivided reign
of China came to an end. The first free sale of tea
at the new location was conducted in October 1834.
It took a further quarter century before
tea auctions developed, to be of serious attraction
to the British tea trade. What was established then,
has continued even to date. The original broker fraternity
comprising of W.J.Thompson & Sons, George White
& Co. and Wilson Smithett & Co. joined by Gow
& Wilson at a later date, still occupy the rostrum,
as succeeding generations to their original concerns.
Presentation of information on catalogues
follows very much the same way with different lots under
individual estates. On the buying side, records maintained
by the Tea Centre inscribe names like Twining, Travers,
Mennell, Ridgway, Peek and Horniman, as original buyers
at the London Auctions. They still continue to do so
on a regular basis.
Uncertainty did exist about the exact
date, when Sri Lanka teas stormed the London Auction.
According to D. M. Forrest, who after much investigation,
tend to be of a different opinion with the popular belief
that 23 pounds of James Taylor’s tea from Loolecondera
was the first lot of Sri Lanka tea to be sold in London
in 1873. In fact, a valuation of Rs 53 or the equivalent
of pound sterling four and shillings 7 had been placed
on this tea. He considers that such a small quantity
could not have found its way into any broker's catalogues.
Up to about 1877 Sri Lanka tea exports had been insignificant
in relation to Indian teas.
According to the Public Ledger maintained
at the Tea Centre, the first entry announcing the sale
of “Ceylon” tea had been made, on the 26th
of October1878. On the 28th Monday, 10 packages of Ceylon
teas along with 277 packages of Indian teas came under
the hammer. The following day the following report was
published.
| Ceylon:-“At the public
sale the first consignment yet received, comprising
10 half chests, was sold at 1s 11 ½ d for
Orange Pekoe, and 10 ½ d for Pekoe Souchong.
These prices were considered fairly satisfactory.
The appearance and style of the leaf is very good,
but the quality of the liquor somewhat dull and
capable of much improvement.” |
With these humble beginnings, the future of Sri Lanka
teas was well conceived. The results of the first outing
attracted great attention and it spread beyond the little
world of Mincing Lane. Growth thereafter was rapid,
and within the first five years, commencing from 1880
to 1885, quantities had increased from 1,229 packages
to 32,577 packages. According to the brokers, within
this period, over fifty new estates had begun to dispatch
teas to London auction on a regular basis.
The social changes that were taking
place, backed by a duty reduction, helped to increase
the tea drinking habit in the country. The per capita
consumption in 1850 was only 2 pounds, but increased
to about 5 pounds in five years. Correspondingly, imports
increased from 85,500,000 to 175,092,000 during the
period 1864 to 1884. This was a crucial period for the
tea producing countries. In addition to maintaining
a steady improvement in their supplies to the UK, they
were also fighting a battle to wane the British away
from the Chinese types, to which they had became accustomed
to earlier. In 1888, Indian teas arriving in the UK
exceeded the Chinese varieties, but Sri Lanka teas had
still to make an impact.
Chinese teas came under heavy attack
as being inferior to Indian teas, and heavily adulterated,
and often contaminated. The outbreak against the Chinese
varieties was so great, that the British trade came
out strongly, referring to these teas as “rubbish,"
and containing poison. It was only at this stage that
the “Assam’s” and the “Ceylon’s”
became a sales attraction, and was used as a guarantee
for quality.
The original attempts at promoting
the sale of Sri Lanka teas in Briton were made by the
planters themselves. It was mostly by word of mouth,
when on home leave, or on retirement, that the planters
passed on the good news regarding the excellent quality
of their teas. Quite a few planters, on retirement,
established small outlets on their own account, for
the sale of Sri Lanka teas.
By the turn of the century, British
tea trade had reached maturity, and settled systems
of operations. By 1903, about 55% of British tea came
from India, and 30% from Sri Lanka. In addition, Java
and Sumatra supplied 19 million, and China’s contribution
had shrunk to 7% or 21 million pounds by weight.
By the turn of the century London auctions
had obtained sufficient support from the main tea producers
provide the main supply line to the Western world, establishing
a global price for the product. India remained the largest
supporter of the London auctions and up to about the
early 1930’s these teas from both north and the
South dominated the sale, their shares often exceeded
60% of total offerings. Sri Lanka’s share on the
other hand, was maintained at around 25%, and the balance
came from Java and Sumatra. East African teas were just
beginning to appear in some of the London brokers catalogues
during this period.
The Second World War interrupted the
continuation of the London auctions, and the sales were
suspended from 24th August 1939 until 16th April 1951.
The termination of the London auctions came at a very
crucial time when most of its sponsors were leaning
toward establishing a marketing system of their own.
When auctions were resumed in 1951,
sale quantities had declined from over 200 million kg
during the peak period to about 50 million kg. The position
however improved thereafter with Indian support. Problems
relating to sale quantities really emerged from the
early part of the 1980’s, and by 1985 Indian offerings
had declined to 10 million and Sri Lanka to 2 million.
East African offerings that peaked in 1980 with 50 million
kg were also beginning to dwindle.
They were fast to procure the support
of the fast emerging markets in Pakistan and Egypt,
and directed most of their production to Mombassa where
a larger cross section of buyers could operate, unlike
in London where the operations are restricted. This
trend that emerged from the early 1980’s continued,
to reach critical levels in 1996. Sale quantities had
diminished to 16 million kg. In contrast, offerings
at sale centres in countries of origin are on a constant
rise. After having obtained the clue from Britain, most
producer countries are expanding their own marketing
methods for the disposal of tea, in a manner most beneficial
to them. |